November 17th, 2006
Before I begin, let me restate an important point: I belive that any job is best done using the most apropriate tool, even if that turns out to be Microsoft software.
In an interview published in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said:
…for basically the whole 18, 19 years that we’ve been pursuing the server and enterprise opportunity, our number one competitor in the data center for new applications has been Unix.
But wait, Windows 3.0 was released in 1990 and then without a networking stack. And Windows NT didn’t even come out until 1994. This makes me really curious what they were doing 18, 19 years ago that he is referring to. I don’t believe they can legitimately be said to be pursuing any “market” without at least releasing a product into that market, right?
Later he says that “[Microsoft's] job has got to be to help our customers get interoperability.” Which is interesting because “In 2004, the European Commission found that Microsoft had abused its market power by deliberately restricting interoperability between Windows PCs and non-Microsoft work group servers.” I wouldn’t be so sure of the sincerity in these claims.
Lies, cowardice, and deceit to breed fear, uncertainty, and doubt. This keeps minds in line. Keeps them from straying from the easiest and widest path.
Note: I’m not addressing the key point of the article at all, which is that Microsoft claims key parts of Linux infringe on their intellectual property rights. I don’t think those claims deserve a response until they are substantiated by proof from Microsoft.
Filed under:
Computers
No Comments »